NEWS

新闻中心

足协评议:成都蓉城胡荷韬进球被吹是误判,点球没判是错误(足协评议结果:蓉城胡荷韬进球遭误吹,漏判点球为错判)

发布时间:2026-02-04


Summarizing the CFA evaluation

er

I’m thinking about providing bullet points that highlight key info from the CFA evaluation, like which match it pertains to, the decisions made, and any potential follow-ups. Specifically, I’m considering whether there will be referee sanctions or if the standings will remain unchanged.

I should clarify the context, like if the match was Chengdu Rongcheng vs Shandong Taishan in the 2024 season. CFA's review reported a wrong disallowed goal and a missed penalty, meaning possible demotion for the referee team, but results usually stand in CSL appeals.Presenting key conclusions

ding

I'm thinking about how to present the main conclusions concisely, so I've come up with bullet points highlighting what the user might want to know, like impacts on points and historical cases.

shoul

  • Conclusion: Two key decisions were wrong (disallowed goal and missed penalty).
  • Immediate consequences: Match result unchanged; referee team likely faces suspension/demotion.
  • Rules: Threshold for offside/foul calls, VAR intervention criteria for obvious errors, and penalty standards.
  • Clubs: Can submit appeals for official resolution but will not get points back.
  • Public response: Possible public report and further training for referees.

Do they want me to clarify the key controversial moments or compare VAR rules with similar cases?

nting

要点

需要我做哪种补充?

nting

  1. 还原当时两个判罚的关键画面与规则点
  2. 拿类似案例对照,说明为何应判/不应判
  3. 简述VAR介入标准与常见误区
  4. 讨论此事对赛季走势/舆情的影响


Copyright 2024 【鲸鱼体育】鲸鱼直播_NBA直播_足球高清直播_英超欧冠CBA在线观看_体育赛事直播 All Rights by 鲸鱼体育